Did Esther Get Her Licks Back?
Buddy Willard is one of the most unsettling characters in The Bell Jar, and it is not because he is openly cruel. It is because he is portrayed as so convincingly perfect. On paper, he is initially described as everything Esther is supposed to desire in a partner. He is charismatic, handsome, and headed toward a respectable career as a doctor. Buddy also offers the lifestyle that all the girls around Esther had been actively seeking. At a time when Esther is coming of age and unsure of who she is becoming, Buddy appears to be the safest option. Yet early on, Esther just feels something off about him. She notices that Buddy often wears “a kind of mild, pleased expression” (Plath 52). He always seems satisfied with himself, as though he knows he is playing the part correctly. In Esther’s eyes, Buddy does not simply exist as a decent man and senses that polish long before she understands why it unsettles her. The illusion finally breaks when she learns about his summer affair. What devastates her is not just that he slept with another woman, but the utter hypocrisy of his persona. Buddy carried himself as morally upright, yet he quietly judged Esther’s time in New York and the freedoms she tasted there even though he allowed himself those same freedoms. When Esther reflects on this double standard, she realizes that she “couldn’t stand the idea of a woman having to have a single pure life and a man being able to have a double life, one pure and one not” (Plath 67). After discovering the truth, her feelings toward Buddy change almost instantaneously. There is no dramatic confrontation, but rather a reduction of everything to one blunt sentence. “I hated him” (Plath 68). The simplicity makes it heavier as Buddy was supposed to represent something steady and morally superior. Once that illusion collapses, he becomes just another man protected by uneven rules. More importantly, Buddy represents one version of Esther’s future. When she imagines her life branching out before her like the green fig tree, she understands that choosing one fig meant losing all the rest. To Esther, Buddy was one of those important figs, yet choosing him would mean closing the door on everything else, but she was still willing to make that sacrifice. Once his hypocrisy is revealed, that fig begins to spoil in her mind. Her later decision to lose her virginity to Irwin feels entangled with this resentment. It is as if she wants to level the playing field. If Buddy could live a double life without consequence, then she refuses to remain bound by a purity standard that only restrains her. On the surface, it appears rebellious, but in truth, it resembles revenge. So did Esther get her revenge? Maybe in a superficial sense as she is no longer confined by the moral expectations she once internalized. But emotionally, nothing truly resolves. The anger she felt toward Buddy was never entirely about him, but the unfair system he embodied. Buddy matters because he represents the first major illusion to collapse in Esther’s life. He is the image of the future she is expected to desire. When she realizes that even he operates within unfair rules, the structure surrounding her begins to crack. He is not a villain in the traditional sense, but a proof to Esther that the world she was taught to trust is not built on equal ground.
Hi Saif, interesting post about Buddy. I liked how you mentioned Buddy with the idea that it never resolved the uneven playing ground even after she lost her virginity to Irwin. I think it just made her feel more infuriated by the way that she couldn't express this as it was an internal feeling. I agree with you that he is not a villain but just a proof of how societal roles worked during her time and her ideologies were ahead of time. Good job!
ReplyDeleteHi, Saif! I really like the route you decided to go with on your blogpost by centering it on Buddy Willard. I agree that his character was one of the most prominent side characters within the novel, and that his presence and relationship with Esther represent more than just a disdain on her part for his character. Rather, he represents what she dislikes about the societal pressures of her time, framing her as the kind of guy she should want and ultimately self-sacrifice and settle for, specifically explicating its unfairness aimed at women. It is a major breaking point for Esther's character at the end of the novel for being the bigger person and not "sticking it to the man" by making Buddy aware of all of these injustices in their lives. She knows that these social constructs did not start with nor will they end with Buddy. Awesome post, Saif!
ReplyDeleteHello Saif! I liked your interpretations of Buddy Willard, but I disagree with your point about her resolution with the "system" that Buddy embodied. I think that she actually does "free" herself from these expectations of society, as she can't go back on her decision, and she is pretty fine with that. Sure, she has "beaten" Buddy, but I think in the process she has also broken through the rules of society in a sense and freed herself. Great job!
ReplyDeleteHey Saif. I like what you said about Buddy, and went in depth with Esther' feelings towards him early on. I think that Esther DOES end up improving her mental health, and reaching a point where she's relatively healthy, and she does end up having her sort of "revenge" against buddy, when she talks with him near the end of the book and in a way, humbles him. Either way, you made a valid point. Great blog!
ReplyDeleteHi Saif! I really like your last paragraph explaining how Esther's "revenge" couldn't entirely be satisfying because the revenge she sought wasn't really against Buddy, but society. Not only does Buddy introduce societal gender double standards into Esther's mind, but also represents them in Esther's life and her attempts to defy them. Great post!
ReplyDeleteI like this account of old Buddy: it's true that, while he stars in some of the most unforgettably awkward moments in all of American literature, he is not necessarily *at fault* for his total embodiment of this system that gives him such a sense of entitlement. That smug expression you describe on his face is the evidence of his entitlement--the point of entitlement, I believe, is that the entitled person *is not aware of their entitlement,* they just think it's the natural order of things. Buddy seems to have had a pretty easy life, and while he surely has to work hard in school, he isn't beset with the same doubts as Esther that it all might be a scam and that there is no promised reward at the end. Even tuberculosis and a stint in a sanitarium doesn't seem to diminish Buddy's unrelenting optimism, and I suppose we should give the old dope some credit for that.
ReplyDeleteIt is interesting to note how this confident expression (and corresponding sense of entitlement?) seems to have diminished by Buddy's final scene in the novel: Esther describes his characteristic confidence to be less visible, describing him as looking like someone who is no longer used to getting his way. He is clearly shaken by his recent record with girlfriends becoming suicidal, and maybe on some level he is slightly less committed to the system that has granted him this sense of entitlement? I don't know--he still asks Esther "who will marry you now?" so he still dismisses her "never getting married" stance, and he also sees her as "damaged goods" now that she has the stigma of this stint in psychiatric hospitals.
I think the question of whether Esther got her revenge is complicated. From the beginning, Esther's relationship with Buddy was part of the script she was supposed to follow as an American woman coming of age during this time period. When Esther lost her virginity to another man, she broke from that script, freeing herself from a future that she found restrictive and depressing and giving her a chance to decide her own path forward. So, I think in the end it didn't really matter whether she got her revenge, because what really mattered is that she gained freedom from the double standard of relationships in this time period.
ReplyDeleteNice post Saif! I like how you analyzed Buddy's character as a whole, rather that just touching on his actions, and how you tie him to a external force in Esther's life. You did a great job of showing that him being hypocritical at times didn't just effect Esther personally, but life defining because he was what she was envisioning her future to be, and the fact that he kind of let her down, sent her into a negative spiral.
ReplyDeleteThis was a very nice analysis, and generally I agree that Esther's one night stand with Irwin was a manifestation of her desire for revenge against Buddy. But I also am more inclined to agree with Samuel and Jason's comments above: in a way, Esther gets revenge against both (her perception of) Buddy and society itself by getting better. By the end of the novel, I think we can say with some confidence that Esther has found some sort of inner peace with herself and her future, and is no longer tortured by the idea that Buddy or any other man might seize control of her life and identity. She's reclaimed her own agency--- I think that's pretty rewarding. (And seeing Buddy in worse sorts, unsure of himself, was also very cathartic and gratifying for me)
ReplyDelete